Closed the conference in Poznan about the climate change, the balance of Brazil is
an important and due recognition to its policy of targets to combat deforestation,
by Al Gore, Ban Ki-moon, Nicholas Stern and many others.This increases the area of
Brazilian leadership in the transition from the Kyoto Protocol and that the
successor regime from 2012.
Our satisfaction can not understand, however, inhibit the pressure on rich countries
to fulfill their mandatory targets. Although, in theory, all they propose to act,
the fragmentation of paths that the correlation is such required a comprehensive
strategy seems to be diluting.
Lost is a sense of duty among the most responsible for emissions of gases that
accelerate climate change. Instead, enter a kind of volunteerism.
Does anyone, how and when you want. So when developing countries are praised for
taking goals, we must remember that account for 20% of emissions. The main focus
needs to remain in rich countries, which account for 80% and they do so little with
so much surround. What does not get the impression that now the matter is because
the developing countries will do their homework.
In Brazil, the setting of targets crown a process driven by a large investment in
measures and structural policies. Even so, we have the moral authority to charge,
the rich countries, ethics and full implementation from the debtor to the humanity
and the planet.
Weakens us, however, a paradox. While our representatives in Poznan showing of the
program of targets for the reduction of deforestation, this amnesty decree was
signed by one year the fines for deforestation. And the winners were all with lyrics
that, far from that period and wish to adapt to the standards of environmental
protection, see it as time to revoke them for good.
It is not the first time that this happens. At the convention of biodiversity,
Brazil was seen as the country of more proactive stance towards the creation of an
international regime to regulate access to genetic resources and adequately
compensate the communities for their traditional knowledge associated with these
resources. At the same time, they postpone the adoption of specific law to regulate
such access. And so continues. The project is two years in the Civil House
(responsible for assistance and advice direct and immediate to the President of the
Republic in the performance of their duties, particularly in matters relating to the
integration and coordination of actions of the government).
Gestures welcomed by Brazilian society and the international community must be
consistent attitudes or we will be always emptied our own victories.
CLOSED the conference in Poznan about the climate change, the balance of Brazil is
an important and due recognition to its policy of targets to combat deforestation,
by Al Gore, Ban Ki-moon, Nicholas Stern and many others.This increases the area of
Brazilian leadership in the transition from the Kyoto Protocol and that the
successor regime from 2012.
Our satisfaction can not understand, however, inhibit the pressure on rich countries
to fulfill their mandatory targets. Although, in theory, all they propose to act,
the fragmentation of paths that the correlation is such required a comprehensive
strategy seems to be diluting.
Lost is a sense of duty among the most responsible for emissions of gases that
accelerate climate change. Instead, enter a kind of volunteerism.
Does anyone, how and when you want. So when developing countries are praised for
taking goals, we must remember that account for 20% of emissions. The main focus
needs to remain in rich countries, which account for 80% and they do so little with
so much surround. What does not get the impression that now the matter is because
the developing countries will do their homework.
In Brazil, the setting of targets crown a process driven by a large investment in
measures and structural policies. Even so, we have the moral authority to charge,
the rich countries, ethics and full implementation from the debtor to the humanity
and the planet.
Weakens us, however, a paradox. While our representatives in Poznan showing of the
program of targets for the reduction of deforestation, this amnesty decree was
signed by one year the fines for deforestation. And the winners were all with lyrics
that, far from that period and wish to adapt to the standards of environmental
protection, see it as time to revoke them for good.
It is not the first time that this happens. At the convention of biodiversity,
Brazil was seen as the country of more proactive stance towards the creation of an
international regime to regulate access to genetic resources and adequately
compensate the communities for their traditional knowledge associated with these
resources. At the same time, they postpone the adoption of specific law to regulate
such access. And so continues. The project is two years in the Civil House
(responsible for assistance and advice direct and immediate to the President of the
Republic in the performance of their duties, particularly in matters relating to the
integration and coordination of actions of the government).
Gestures welcomed by Brazilian society and the international community must be
consistent attitudes or we will be always emptied our own victories.